File size: 4,548 Bytes
10c0ee7
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
b64931f
 
5f5c6f4
b64931f
 
933a968
 
b64931f
 
5f5c6f4
b64931f
 
 
 
 
5f5c6f4
b64931f
 
d4986ce
b64931f
 
 
5f5c6f4
b64931f
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
5f5c6f4
 
b64931f
 
 
 
 
5294acf
 
 
 
 
 
 
b64931f
 
331f7d8
 
b64931f
5f5c6f4
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
b64931f
b452610
386c59b
 
 
 
 
 
 
699e931
b452610
386c59b
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
---
tags:
- DNA
- Genomics
- Plants
pretty_name: Plant Genomic Benchmark
license: cc-by-nc-sa-4.0
---


## Dataset Overview
This dataset features the 8 evaluation tasks presented in the AgroNT (A Foundational Large Language Model for Edible Plant
Genomes) paper. The tasks cover single output regression, multi output regression, binary classification, and multi-label classification which
aim to provide a comprehensive plant genomics benchmark. Additionally, we provide results from in silico saturation mutagenesis analysis of sequences
from the cassava genome, assessing the impact of >10 million mutations on gene expression levels and enhancer elements. See the ISM section
below for details regarding the data from this analysis.


| Name    | # of Datasets(Species) | Task Type    | Sequence Length (base pair) |
| -------- | ------- | -------- | ------- | 
| Polyadenylation  | 6    | Binary Classification  | 400    |
| Splice Site | 2     | Binary Classification | 398     | 
| LncRNA    | 6    | Binary Classification    | 101-6000  |
| Promoter Strength    | 2    | Single Variable Regression    | 170 |
| Terminator Strength    | 2    | Single Variable Regression    | 170 |
| Chromatin Accessibility    | 7    | Multi-label Classification   | 1000 |
| Gene Expression    | 6        | Multi-Variable Regression  | 6000 |
| Enhancer Region    | 1        | Binary Classification    | 1000 |


## Dataset Sizes
| Task Name    | # Train Samples | # Validation Samples   | # Test Samples |
| -------- | ------- | -------- | ------- | 
|poly_a.arabidopsis_thaliana|170835|---|30384|
|poly_a.oryza_sativa_indica_group|98139|---|16776|
|poly_a.trifolium_pratense|111138|---|13746|
|poly_a.medicago_truncatula|47277|---|8850|
|poly_a.chlamydomonas_reinhardtii|90378|---|10542|
|poly_a.oryza_sativa_japonica_group|120621|---|20232|
|splicing.arabidopsis_thaliana_donor|2588034|---|377873|
|splicing.arabidopsis_thaliana_acceptor|1704844|---|250084|
|lncrna.m_esculenta|4934|---|360|
|lncrna.z_mays|8423|---|1629|
|lncrna.g_max|11430|---|490|
|lncrna.s_lycopersicum|7274|---|1072|
|lncrna.t_aestivum|11252|---|1810|
|lncrna.s_bicolor|8654|---|734|
|promoter_strength.leaf|58179|6825|7154|
|promoter_strength.protoplast|61051|7162|7595|
|terminator_strength.leaf|43294|5309|4806|
|terminator_strength.protoplast|43289|5309|4811|
|gene_exp.glycine_max|47136|4803|4803|
|gene_exp.oryza_sativa|31244|3702|3702|
|gene_exp.solanum_lycopersicum|27321|3827|3827|
|gene_exp.zea_mays|34493|4483|4483|
|gene_exp.arabidopsis_thaliana|25731|3401|3402|
|chromatin_access.oryza_sativa_MH63_RS2|5120000|14848|14848|
|chromatin_access.setaria_italica|5120000|19968|19968|
|chromatin_access.oryza_sativa_ZS97_RS2|5120000|14848|14848|
|chromatin_access.arabidopis_thaliana|5120000|9984|9984|
|chromatin_access.brachypodium_distachyon|5120000|14848|14848|
|chromatin_access.sorghum_bicolor|5120000|29952|29952|
|chromatin_access.zea_mays|6400000|79872|79872|
|pro_seq.m_esculenta|16852|1229|812|

*** It is important to note that fine-tuning for lncrna was carried out using all datasets in a single training. The reason for this is that the datasets are small and combining
them helped to improve learning.

## Example Usage
```python
from datasets import load_dataset

task_name='terminator_strength.protoplast' # one of the task names from the above table

dataset = load_dataset("InstaDeepAI/plant-genomic-benchmark",task_name=task_name)

```

## In Silico Saturation Mutagensis 
### File structure for: ISM_Tables/Mesculenta_305_v6_PROseq_ISM_LOG2FC.txt.gz
Intergenic enhancer regions based on Lozano et al. 2021 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34499719/) <br>
Genome version: Manihot esculenta reference genome v6.1 from Phytozome <br>
CHR: Chromosome <br> 
POS: Physical position (bp) <br>
REF: Reference allele <br>
ALT: Alternative allele <br>
LOG2FC: Log fold change in Intergenic enhancer probability (log2(p_mutated_sequence / p_original_sequence)) <br>

### File structure for: ISM_Tables/Mesculenta_v6_GeneExpression_ISM_LOG2FC.txt.gz
Gene expression prediction based on: Wilson et al. 2016 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28116755/) <br>
Genome version: Manihot esculenta reference genome v6 from Ensembl 56 <br>
CHR: Chromosome <br>
POS: Physical position (bp) <br>
REF: Reference allele <br>
ALT: Alternative allele <br>
GENE: Gene ID <br>
STRAND: Gene strand <br>
TISSUE: Tissue type (Acronyms detailed in Figure 1 of Wilson et al.) <br>
LOG2FC: Gene expression log fold change (log2(gene_exp_mutated_sequence / gene_exp_original_sequence)) <br>