GMAI-MMBench

This repository is the official implementation of the paper GMAI-MMBench: A Comprehensive Multimodal Evaluation Benchmark Towards General Medical AI.

🌈 Update

🔥 [2024-06-05]: Submit on NeurIPS2024! 🌟

Benchmark Details

We introduce GMAI-MMBench: the most comprehensive general medical AI benchmark with well-categorized data structure and multi-perceptual granularity to date. It is constructed from 285 datasets across 38 medical image modalities, 19 clinical-related tasks, 18 departments, and 4 perceptual granularities in a Visual Question Answering (VQA) format. Additionally, we implemented a lexical tree structure that allows users to customize evaluation tasks, accommodating various assessment needs and substantially supporting medical AI research and applications. We evaluated 50 LVLMs, and the results show that even the advanced GPT-4o only achieves an accuracy of 52%, indicating significant room for improvement. We believe GMAI-MMBench will stimulate the community to build the next generation of LVLMs toward GMAI.

Benchmark Creation

GMAI-MMBench is constructed from 285 datasets across 38 medical image modalities. These datasets are derived from the public (268) and several hospitals (17) that have agreed to share their ethically approved data. The data collection can be divided into three main steps:

We search hundreds of datasets from both the public and hospitals, then keep 285 datasets with highly qualified labels after dataset filtering, uniforming image format, and standardizing label expression.
We categorize all labels into 19 clinical VQA tasks and 18 clinical departments, then export a lexical tree for easily customized evaluation.
We generate QA pairs for each label from its corresponding question and option pool. Each question must include information about image modality, task cue, and corresponding annotation granularity. The final benchmark is obtained through additional validation and manual selection.

Lexical Tree

In this work, to make the GMAI-MMBench more intuitive and user-friendly, we have systematized our labels and structured the entire dataset into a lexical tree. Users can freely select the test contents based on this lexical tree. We believe that this customizable benchmark will effectively guide the improvement of models in specific areas.

You can see the complete lexical tree at 🍎 Homepage.

Evaluation

An example of how to use the Lexical Tree for customizing evaluations. The process involves selecting the department (ophthalmology), choosing the modality (fundus photography), filtering questions using relevant keywords, and evaluating different models based on their accuracy in answering the filtered questions.

🏆 Leaderboard

Rank	Model Name	Val	Test
	Random	25.70	25.94
1	GPT-4o	53.53	53.96
2	Gemini 1.5	47.42	48.36
3	Gemini 1.0	44.48	44.93
4	GPT-4V	42.50	44.33
5	Qwen-VL-Max	41.34	41.96
6	MedDr	41.95	43.69
7	MiniCPM-V2	41.79	42.54
8	DeepSeek-VL-7B	41.73	43.43
9	LLAVA-InternLM2-7b	40.07	40.45
10	InternVL-Chat-V1.5	38.86	39.79
11	TransCore-M	38.60	39.20
12	XComposer2	38.68	39.20
13	LLAVA-V1.5-7B	38.23	37.96
14	OmniLMM-12B	37.89	39.09
15	Emu2-Chat	37.86	37.93
16	mPLUG-Owl2	35.62	36.51
17	CogVLM-Chat	35.23	36.08
18	Qwen-VL-Chat	35.07	37.08
19	Yi-VL-6B	34.82	34.31
20	Claude3-Opus	32.37	32.44
21	MMAlaya	32.19	32.30
22	Mini-Gemini-7B	32.11	32.13
23	InstructBLIP-7B	31.80	30.95
24	Idelecs-9B-Instruct	29.74	31.13
25	VisualGLM-6B	29.58	30.45
26	RadFM	22.95	23.06
27	Qilin-Med-VL-Chat	22.34	22.06
28	LLaVA-Med	20.54	19.60
29	Med-Flamingo	12.74	11.64

Disclaimers

The guidelines for the annotators emphasized strict compliance with copyright and licensing rules from the initial data source, specifically avoiding materials from websites that forbid copying and redistribution. Should you encounter any data samples potentially breaching the copyright or licensing regulations of any site, we encourage you to contact us. Upon verification, such samples will be promptly removed.

Contact

Citation

BibTeX:

@misc{chen2024gmaimmbenchcomprehensivemultimodalevaluation,
      title={GMAI-MMBench: A Comprehensive Multimodal Evaluation Benchmark Towards General Medical AI}, 
      author={Pengcheng Chen and Jin Ye and Guoan Wang and Yanjun Li and Zhongying Deng and Wei Li and Tianbin Li and Haodong Duan and Ziyan Huang and Yanzhou Su and Benyou Wang and Shaoting Zhang and Bin Fu and Jianfei Cai and Bohan Zhuang and Eric J Seibel and Junjun He and Yu Qiao},
      year={2024},
      eprint={2408.03361},
      archivePrefix={arXiv},
      primaryClass={eess.IV},
      url={https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.03361}, 
}

Datasets:

OpenGVLab
/

GMAI-MMBench

You need to agree to share your contact information to access this dataset