Fixed typo
Browse files
README.md
CHANGED
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@ The model can also be used as a starting point for further fine-tuning of RoBERT
|
|
33 |
|
34 |
|
35 |
# Performance
|
36 |
-
To evaluate the performance of our general-purpose sentiment analysis model, we set aside an evaluation set from each data set, which was not used for training. On average, our model outperforms a [DistilBERT-based model](https://huggingface.co/distilbert-base-uncased-finetuned-sst-2-english) (which is solely fine-tuned on the popular SST-2 data set) by more than 15 percentage points (78.1 vs. 93.2 percent, see table below). As a robustness check, we evaluate the model in a leave-
|
37 |
|
38 |
|Dataset|DistilBERT SST-2|This model|
|
39 |
|---|---|---|
|
|
|
33 |
|
34 |
|
35 |
# Performance
|
36 |
+
To evaluate the performance of our general-purpose sentiment analysis model, we set aside an evaluation set from each data set, which was not used for training. On average, our model outperforms a [DistilBERT-based model](https://huggingface.co/distilbert-base-uncased-finetuned-sst-2-english) (which is solely fine-tuned on the popular SST-2 data set) by more than 15 percentage points (78.1 vs. 93.2 percent, see table below). As a robustness check, we evaluate the model in a leave-one-out manner (training on 14 data sets, evaluating on the one left out), which decreases model performance by only about 3 percentage points on average and underscores its generalizability. Model performance is given as evaluation set accuracy in percent.
|
37 |
|
38 |
|Dataset|DistilBERT SST-2|This model|
|
39 |
|---|---|---|
|