persian_llm_leaderboard

Running

App Files Files Community

Behnamm commited on 17 days ago

Commit

2d2091d

•

1 Parent(s): d9c7f38

Update src/about.py

Browse files

Files changed (1) hide show

src/about.py +2 -1

src/about.py CHANGED Viewed

@@ -64,6 +64,7 @@ We use our own framework to evaluate the models on the following benchmarks (TO
 - <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.06154" target="_blank">  ParsiNLU MCQA </a> (0-shot) - a series of multiple-choice questions in domains of *literature*, *math & logic*, and *common knowledge*.
 - <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.06154" target="_blank">  ParsiNLU NLI </a> (max[0,3,5,10]-shot) - a 3-way classification to determine whether a hypothesis sentence entails, contradicts, or is neutral with respect to a given premise sentence.
 - <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.06154" target="_blank">  ParsiNLU QQP </a> (max[0,2,5,10]-shot) - task of deciding whether a whether two given questions are paraphrases of each other or not.
 For all these evaluations, a higher score is a better score.
@@ -71,7 +72,7 @@ We use the given *test* subset (for those benchmarks that also have *train* and
 These benchmarks are picked for now, but several other benchmarks are going to be added later to help us perform a more thorough examination of models.
-The last two benchmarks, ParsiNLU NLI and ParsiNLU QQP are evaluated in different few-shot settings and then the maximum score is returned as the final evaluation.
 We argue that this is indeed a fair evaluation scheme since many light-weight models (around ~7B and less) can have a poor in-context learning in long-context prompts and thus perform better
 in smaller shots (or have a small knowledge capacity and perform poorly in zero-shot). We wish to not hold this against the model by trying to measure performances in different settings and take the maximum score achieved .

 - <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.06154" target="_blank">  ParsiNLU MCQA </a> (0-shot) - a series of multiple-choice questions in domains of *literature*, *math & logic*, and *common knowledge*.
 - <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.06154" target="_blank">  ParsiNLU NLI </a> (max[0,3,5,10]-shot) - a 3-way classification to determine whether a hypothesis sentence entails, contradicts, or is neutral with respect to a given premise sentence.
 - <a href="https://arxiv.org/abs/2012.06154" target="_blank">  ParsiNLU QQP </a> (max[0,2,5,10]-shot) - task of deciding whether a whether two given questions are paraphrases of each other or not.
+- <a href="https://huggingface.co/datasets/MatinaLLM/persian_arc" target="_blank">  Persian ARC </a> (0-shot) - <a href="https://huggingface.co/datasets/allenai/ai2_arc" target="_blank"> ARC </a> dataset translated to Persian using GPT-4o.
 For all these evaluations, a higher score is a better score.
 These benchmarks are picked for now, but several other benchmarks are going to be added later to help us perform a more thorough examination of models.
+The benchmarks ParsiNLU NLI and ParsiNLU QQP are evaluated in different few-shot settings and then the maximum score is returned as the final evaluation.
 We argue that this is indeed a fair evaluation scheme since many light-weight models (around ~7B and less) can have a poor in-context learning in long-context prompts and thus perform better
 in smaller shots (or have a small knowledge capacity and perform poorly in zero-shot). We wish to not hold this against the model by trying to measure performances in different settings and take the maximum score achieved .