aotrih's picture
whisperkittools generated README.md
fe836f8 verified
metadata
pretty_name: WhisperKit ASR Evaluation Results
tags:
  - whisper
  - whisperkit
  - coreml
  - asr
  - quantized

WhisperKit Evaluation Results

Dataset: librispeech

WhisperKit + openai_whisper-large-v3 (+optimized variants)

WER QoI (%) File Size (MB)
openai_whisper-large-v3 2.44 100 3100
openai_whisper-large-v3_turbo 2.41 99.8 3100
openai_whisper-large-v3_turbo_1307MB 2.6 97.7 1307
openai_whisper-large-v3_turbo_1049MB 4.81 91 1049
openai_whisper-large-v3_1053MB 4.65 90.8 1053

Different Projects + openai_whisper-large-v3

WER Commit Hash Model Format
WhisperKit 2.44 0f8b4fe Core ML
WhisperCpp 2.36 e72e415 Core ML + GGUF
WhisperMLX 2.69 614de66 MLX (Numpy)

Quality-of-Inference (QoI) Certification

We believe that rigorously measuring the quality of inference is necessary for developers and enterprises to make informed decisions when opting to use optimized or compressed variants of Whisper models in production. The current measurements are between reference and optimized WhisperKit models. We are going to extend the scope of this measurement to other Whisper implementations soon so developers can certify the behavior change (if any) caused by alternating use of WhisperKit with (or migration from) these implementations.

In all measurements, we care primarily about per-example no-regressions (quantified as qoi below) which is a stricter metric compared to dataset average WER. A 100% qoi preserves perfect backwards-compatibility on the test distribution and avoids "perceived regressions", the phenomenon where per-example known behavior changes after a code/model update and causes divergence in downstream code or breaks the user experience itself (even if dataset averages might stay flat across updates). Pseudocode for qoi:

qoi = []
for example in dataset:
    no_regression = wer(optimized_model(example)) <= wer(reference_model(example))
    qoi.append(no_regression)
qoi = (sum(qoi) / len(qoi)) * 100.

We define the reference model as the default float16 precision Core ML model that is generated by whisperkittools. This reference model matches the accuracy of the original PyTorch model on the specified test sets. We use librispeech/test.clean (5 hours of short English audio clips) as our testing set for Whisper. We are actively expanding our test set coverage to earnings22 (120 hours of long English audio clips with various accents). We anticipate developers that use Whisper in production to have their own Quality Assurance test sets and whisperkittools offers the tooling necessary to run the same measurements on such custom test sets, please see the Model Evaluation on Custom Dataset for details.

Reproducing Results

Results in this page are generated by our cluster of Apple Silicon Macs. We use them as self-hosted runners on Github Actions as our CI infrastructure. Due to security concerns, we are unable to open up the cluster to the public. However, any Apple Silicon Mac (even with 8GB RAM) can be used to run identical evaluation jobs locally. For reference, our M2 Ultra devices complete a librispeech + openai/whisper-large-v3 evaluation in under 1 hour regardless of the Whisper implementation. Older Apple Silicon Macs should take less than 1 day to complete the same evaluation.

Glossary:

  • _turbo: Indicates the presence of additional optimizations (not compression) to unlock streaming transcription as described in our Blog Post.

  • _*MB: Indicates the presence of mixed-bit quantization. Instead of cluttering the filename with details like _AudioEncoder-5.8bits_TextDecoder-6.1bits, we choose to summarize the compression spec as the resulting total file size since this is what matters to developers in production.