License NC?
Hi there! I was wondering if there's any reason for why the model is NC (non-commercial)? It stops me from using it and I guess also stops a lot of other people from using it hence building some traction.
Thanks,
Radu-Sebastian Amarie
Hello!
For this model I've opted to stick with the license chosen for the dataset: https://huggingface.co/datasets/DFKI-SLT/few-nerd
I do wish I could reasonably change this model's license, but it's a bit tricky to do so given the dataset.
- Tom Aarsen
I agree but the dataset is cc-by-sa-4.0 not cc-by-nc-sa-4.0 🤔
You're absolutely right, that was an oversight by me! I've updated the license to cc-by-sa-4.0.
Thanks for letting me know!
- Tom Aarsen
Thanks @tomaarsen .
Also, it's the same for https://huggingface.co/tomaarsen/span-marker-mbert-base-multinerd
Also, really great job with Span Marker and the spacy integration, from manual testing, it seems your model is better the ones spacy provides.
I've now started to train it myself to check it out, and also wanted to give it a try and use microsoft/deberta-v3-large as a base, but I've stumbled in some wrong tensor sizes, added an issue on github (https://github.com/tomaarsen/SpanMarkerNER/issues/56) do you have any idea of a quick fix or should I drop it since the encoder is a bit different than what's supposed to work?